Fox Islands corpus record: charlevoixsentin1219unse, undated

Summary

The audit matched the name North Fox Island in a page of the charlevoixsentin1219unse, which the index carries undated. It kept the body as a local mention because the mention names North Fox by direction rather than a bare Fox Island. What follows is the indexed context. The page holds more.

Indexed context

nlkfest,“ and the bunch who went from bne came back sing w^i, ,‘nterlnine<l then- following lue weddiiig fesllvllU-s, by gocd old Abos Fox nod his wife. The Im ; :■>•. e’.iienU to the property are a decided iiupruvemeut to Uiver street. — H. O. runk, of Chicago and Fox Island, were here over Sunday, ar ranalng to locate his family here (his summer. Mr. I’lank ownes all North Fox Island as well as a part of , , the suoth l.land. rhere he I, est-ab- cal mlereal. a. weU a. .IreugtbeoinK The Dawning of the New DIepenee- tion. The p-oi’“ iuv’-* spoken, anil after nine o’click next Friday evening there wilt not be en open sa’iiioii in Char’. V lix rr.iiiityj But •. . M . . !■ I. . I < *. > I.I U . - V. 1 1 1.^ storm. l

Scope and limits

A mention is not an event. Where a held source supports one, a curated article under event/ carries the claim and this record is only its evidence. Deduplication here suppresses byte-identical bodies alone, so a second OCR edition of the same page is still a second record. The name is not unique to Michigan either, which is why the audit tests for a local cue at all. Read the cited source before you cite it.

Added 1 August 2026 · revised 3 August 2026. Recent changes